NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 4.16 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Launch date | 12 October 2009 vs 1 October 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 500 MHz
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 126 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | R500 |
Code name | GT218 | RV515 |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 1 October 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
Place in performance rating | 1674 | not rated |
Price now | $32.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |