NVIDIA GeForce 305M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 305M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 305M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 28 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 113
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 113 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 36.8 gflops
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 408 vs 151
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8210 vs 1987
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 36.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 408 vs 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 vs 1987 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 305M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 305M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 151 | 408 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1987 | 8210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 305M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT215 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1326 | 1327 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1249 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 36.8 gflops | 240 gflops |
Gigaflops | 55 | 360 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | 8.0 |
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |