NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 5.76 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 115.2 gflops vs 48.96 gflops
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1595 vs 1167
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1595 vs 1167
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 5.76 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 115.2 gflops vs 48.96 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1595 vs 1167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1595 vs 1167 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 | 1595 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GT218 | M92 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1673 | 1562 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 720 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | 115.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 5.76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |