NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 3.8x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 400 MHz
• Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• Around 91% better floating-point performance: 48.96 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 119 vs 50
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1167 vs 392
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1167 vs 392

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 14 Watt
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 45 vs 22

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 50
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22 45
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1167 392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1167 392

Compare specifications (specs)