NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 580 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.64 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 48.96 gflops vs 23.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1167 vs 784
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1167 vs 784
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 15 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops vs 23.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 vs 784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 vs 784 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 14 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 136 vs 116
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 28 vs 22
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 14 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 vs 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 28 vs 22 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 116 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | 28 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | 784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 | 784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G98 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 15 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1671 | 1673 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 580 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | 23.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-I |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |