NVIDIA GeForce 315M vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315M and ATI Radeon HD 3470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 4.85 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1401 vs 764
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1401 vs 764
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 23 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1401 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1401 vs 764 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3470
- 2.5x more pipelines: 40 vs 16
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 64 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 117 vs 115
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 55 vs 36
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 40 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 64 gflops vs 38.78 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 117 vs 115 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 55 vs 36 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315M | ATI Radeon HD 3470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 115 | 117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 36 | 55 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2910 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1401 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1401 | 764 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 315M | ATI Radeon HD 3470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GT218 | RV620 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 23 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1636 | 1638 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 38.78 gflops | 64 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 15.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |