NVIDIA GeForce 315M vs NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315M and NVIDIA NVS 3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 606 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 36 vs 35
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1401 vs 988
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1401 vs 988
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz vs 606 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 36 vs 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2910 vs 2905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1401 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1401 vs 988 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 3100M
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 46.98 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 116 vs 115
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 46.98 gflops vs 38.78 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 116 vs 115 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315M | NVIDIA NVS 3100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 115 | 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 36 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2910 | 2905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1401 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1401 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 578 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 578 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 315M | NVIDIA NVS 3100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT218 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1641 | 1642 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz | 606 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 38.78 gflops | 46.98 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | 4.85 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |