NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 4200M and NVIDIA GeForce 315M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
• 4x better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 287 vs 115
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 78 vs 36
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1726 vs 1401
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1726 vs 1401

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M

• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 25 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2910 vs 1155

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 4200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 315M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	287 115
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	78 36
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1155 2910
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1726 1401
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1726 1401

Compare specifications (specs)