NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 320M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
Launch date 1 April 2010 vs 1 November 2009
Core clock speed 450 MHz vs 350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 55 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP

Name NVIDIA GeForce 320M ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 210
PassMark - G2D Mark 59
Geekbench - OpenCL 2474
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1735
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 512.106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 83.628

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 320M ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 TeraScale
Code name MCP89 RS880
Launch date 1 April 2010 1 November 2009
Place in performance rating 1573 1575
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 450 MHz 350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 32
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt
Transistor count 486 million 181 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.1
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Shared memory yes