NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6620G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 169 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2011 vs 15 June 2011 |
Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 169 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G
- 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 341 vs 255
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 962 vs 758
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 vs 1254
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 vs 1254
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 1723
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 1723
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 400 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 341 vs 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 962 vs 758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1755 vs 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1755 vs 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 vs 1723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 vs 1723 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6620G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 169 | 103 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 255 | 341 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 758 | 962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1254 | 1755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1254 | 1755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1723 | 3310 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1723 | 3310 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 790 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 790 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF119 | Llano |
Launch date | 29 September 2011 | 15 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1348 | 1350 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.42 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 4.18 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | 1000 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 |