NVIDIA GeForce 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 615 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce 615

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 141 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 494
3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 83

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 May 2012 vs 16 January 2009
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	49 Watt vs 141 Watt
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	507 vs 494
PassMark - G2D Mark	292 vs 83

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

2.8x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 660 MHz
8.9x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 5.28 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
3.7x better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
16.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.055 vs 3.257
Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1708
Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1708

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1836 MHz vs 660 MHz
Texture fill rate	47.2 billion / sec vs 5.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines	128 vs 48
Floating-point performance	470.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.055 vs 3.257
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309 vs 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309 vs 1708

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

507

494

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

292

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.257

54.055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1708

3309

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1708

3309

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 615	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
PassMark - G3D Mark	507	494
PassMark - G2D Mark	292	83
Geekbench - OpenCL	1324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.257	54.055
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1708	3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1708	3309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.56
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		108.412

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 615	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF108	G92B
Launch date	15 May 2012	16 January 2009
Place in performance rating	1308	1310
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$229
Technical info
Core clock speed	660 MHz	1836 MHz
Floating-point performance	126.7 gflops	470.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	48	128
Texture fill rate	5.28 GTexel / s	47.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	49 Watt	141 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	754 million
CUDA cores		128
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	70.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1100 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI