AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs NVIDIA GeForce 615
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 660 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 946 vs 507
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5343 vs 1324
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.765 vs 3.257
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 668
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 1286
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1853 vs 1708
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 668
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 1286
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1853 vs 1708
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops vs 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 946 vs 507 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5343 vs 1324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 vs 3.257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 vs 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 vs 1708 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 176
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 vs 176 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 946 | 507 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 292 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5343 | 1324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | 3.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 | 1708 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Meso | GF108 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1309 | 1312 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 660 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 5.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |