AMD Radeon R5 230 vs NVIDIA GeForce 615
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 58% better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4127 vs 1322
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2480 vs 1708
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2480 vs 1708
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 vs 15 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 vs 1322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 vs 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 vs 1708 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 5.28 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 514 vs 222
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 255
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 668 vs 439
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 668 vs 439
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1286 vs 992
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1286 vs 992
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 5.28 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 514 vs 222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 668 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 668 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1286 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1286 vs 992 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 222 | 514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 301 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 | 1322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 439 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 439 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 | 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 | 1708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.257 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Caicos | GF108 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1313 |
Price now | $50 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 5.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 585 million |
Core clock speed | 660 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay |