NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs Intel HD Graphics 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • 3.6x more core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 713
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1103
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 1713
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 713
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1103
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 1713
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 24 July 2013 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed 719 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 96 vs 40
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1030 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3075 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3325 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1030 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3075 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3325 vs 1713

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

  • Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 454
  • Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 125
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3134 vs 2457
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 6.51
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 148.156
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 587 vs 454
PassMark - G2D Mark 221 vs 125
Geekbench - OpenCL 3134 vs 2457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.563 vs 6.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 490.588 vs 148.156

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
454
587
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
125
221
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2457
3134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.51
9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
148.156
490.588
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1030
713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3075
1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3325
1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1030
713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3075
1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3325
1713
Name NVIDIA GeForce 710M Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark 454 587
PassMark - G2D Mark 125 221
Geekbench - OpenCL 2457 3134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.51 9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 148.156 490.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1030 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3075 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3325 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1030 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3075 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3325 1713
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 710M Intel HD Graphics 5000

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Generation 7.5
Code name GK208 Haswell GT3
Launch date 24 July 2013 27 May 2013
Place in performance rating 1387 1388
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 719 MHz 200 MHz
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 96 40
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,300 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 2560x1600
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 2560x1600
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0 1
Standard memory configuration DDR3

Technologies

Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
Quick Sync