NVIDIA GeForce 710M versus Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 3.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 719 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 40
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 versus 713
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 versus 1103
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 1713
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 versus 713
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 versus 1103
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 1713
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 July 2013 versus 27 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 40 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 30 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 versus 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 versus 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 versus 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 versus 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 1713 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5000
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 versus 454
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 versus 125
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3134 versus 2457
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 versus 6.51
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 versus 148.156
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 versus 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 versus 125 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3134 versus 2457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 versus 6.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 versus 148.156 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 | 587 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 221 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2457 | 3134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | 9.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | 490.588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 1713 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 710M | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GK208 | Haswell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 24 July 2013 | 27 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1387 | 1388 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 40 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 710M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5000
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
IntelHD Graphics
