NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2467 vs 2396
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.51 vs 5.055
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 vs 10.393
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 967
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 2766
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 967
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 2766

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 539 vs 460
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 125
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 148.156
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.577
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3325

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 539
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	125 150
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2467 2396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.51 5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	148.156 215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.577 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.718 10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.855 19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 3359

Compare specifications (specs)