NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2457 vs 2387
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.51 vs 5.055
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 vs 10.393
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 967
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 2766
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 967
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 2766
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 July 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2457 vs 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 vs 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 vs 10.393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 vs 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 vs 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 vs 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 vs 2766 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 454
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 125
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 148.156
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.577
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3325
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3325
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 vs 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 vs 125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 vs 148.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 vs 0.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 vs 19.855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3325 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 | 532 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 152 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2457 | 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | 215.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | 10.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | 19.903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GK208 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 24 July 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1387 | 1390 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |

