NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 5.904 GTexel / s vs 5.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 192
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 72
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 8 December 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s vs 5.1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 192 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 72 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | 192 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 72 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Curie |
| Code name | GF117 | NV40 A1 |
| Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 8 December 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 1511 | 1508 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | |
| Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 5.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
