NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA NVS 5200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 672 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 188
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 703 vs 222
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1123 vs 1099
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 703 vs 222
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1123 vs 1099

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 10.75 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• Around 82% better floating-point performance: 258.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 477
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2130 vs 1303
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 4.91
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 109.13
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 7.249
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.851 vs 15.218
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 1601
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 1601

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5200M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	477 507
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	195 188
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1303 2130
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.91 5.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.13 189.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.249 9.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.218 16.851
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	703 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1601 2715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	703 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1601 2715

Compare specifications (specs)