NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 32 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.218 vs 12.554
- 24.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 703 vs 28.9
- 23.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1123 vs 48.1
- 16x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1601 vs 99.8
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 3 February 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 vs 12.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 vs 28.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 vs 48.1 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 vs 99.8 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 4x more texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 4x better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.577 vs 4.91
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 226.218 vs 109.13
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.947 vs 7.249
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1706 vs 703
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2983 vs 1123
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5586 vs 1601
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.577 vs 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 226.218 vs 109.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.947 vs 7.249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1706 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2983 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5586 vs 1601 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | 6.577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | 226.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | 11.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | 12.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | 1706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 2983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 5586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | 28.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 48.1 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 99.8 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.559 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | GK107 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 3 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1511 | 1512 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 23.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 32 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 40 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |