NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.91 vs 2.907
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 24 April 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 vs 2.907 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 14 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.993 vs 109.13
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.65 vs 7.249
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 vs 15.218
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 vs 1123
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 vs 1123
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.993 vs 109.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.65 vs 7.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 vs 15.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2029 vs 1123 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | 2.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | 182.993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | 7.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | 18.19 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 2029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 2029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | GK107 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1511 | 1514 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 875 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 14 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |