NVIDIA GeForce 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8200 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 156 vs 131
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 71 vs 42
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 47 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 vs 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 71 vs 42 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1397 vs 600
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1397 vs 600
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 vs 600 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 vs 600 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8200 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 | 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 71 | 42 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 600 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 600 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 449 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 449 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8200 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | C78 | G84 |
Launch date | 17 April 2007 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1620 | 1621 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 540 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 289 million |
Floating-point performance | 76.16 gflops | |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCI | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |