NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 38 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 248 vs 156
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 858 vs 600
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 858 vs 600
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 September 2007 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 vs 156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 858 vs 600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 858 vs 600 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 460 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 71 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 460 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 71 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 | 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 | 71 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 858 | 600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 858 | 600 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G84 | C78 |
| Launch date | 12 September 2007 | 17 April 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1619 | 1620 |
| Price now | $89.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.66 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 460 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 29.44 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Texture fill rate | 3.68 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 289 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |
