NVIDIA GeForce G102M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G102M and NVIDIA GeForce 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 40 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 156
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 890 vs 600
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 890 vs 600

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 90 nm
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 71 vs 59

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	59 71
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	168 156
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	890 600
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	890 600

Compare specifications (specs)