NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 800 MHz
| Launch date | 21 March 2015 vs 1 July 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS AGP
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 45 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS AGP
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS AGP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS AGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
| Code name | GK107 | G73 |
| Launch date | 21 March 2015 | 1 July 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 1444 | not rated |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 27 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 177 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 23.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
