NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 820M

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 15% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 706 MHz
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 vs 0.642
Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 vs 11.732
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 vs 16.3
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1447 vs 861
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1443
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 861
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1443

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 March 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	810 MHz vs 706 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.686 vs 0.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	14.257 vs 11.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	22.768 vs 16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1447 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349 vs 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1447 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349 vs 1443

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

2.3x more texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
2.3x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1802 MHz
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1088 vs 490
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 114
Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3074 vs 2789
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 7.765
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 161.305
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1195
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1195

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	22.59 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 96
Floating-point performance	542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz vs 1802 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1088 vs 490
PassMark - G2D Mark	253 vs 114
Geekbench - OpenCL	3074 vs 2789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649 vs 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555 vs 161.305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892 vs 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892 vs 1195

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

490

1088

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

114

253

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2789

3074

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.765

8.649

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

161.305

174.555

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.686

0.642

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.257

11.732

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22.768

16.3

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1195

1892

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1447

861

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

1443

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1195

1892

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1447

861

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

1443

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 820M	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	490	1088
PassMark - G2D Mark	114	253
Geekbench - OpenCL	2789	3074
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.765	8.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	161.305	174.555
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.686	0.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	14.257	11.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	22.768	16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1195	1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1447	861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1195	1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1447	861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	1443
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	847	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 820M	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Launch date	21 March 2015	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1444	1447
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$109.94
Price now		$79
Value for money (0-100)		17.59
Technical info
Core clock speed	810 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	240.0 gflops	542.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	96	384
Texture fill rate	10 GTexel / s	22.59 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	44.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1802 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management