NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 69% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 480 MHz
• 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 2x 8
• 6.3x better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 2x 19.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB
• Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• 7.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 490 vs 67
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 114 vs 89

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	490 67
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	114 89

Compare specifications (specs)