NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 vs 22.557
• 28.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 42
• 26.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 55
• 46.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 72.2

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 810 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 29.63 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 3x better floating-point performance: 711.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5016 MHz vs 1802 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 vs 7.765
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 vs 161.305
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 vs 0.686
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 vs 14.257
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 vs 1195
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 vs 1447
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.765 10.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.305 370.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.686 1.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.257 20.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.768 22.557
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 2483
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 3406
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 4045
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 42
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 55
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 72.2

Compare specifications (specs)