NVIDIA GeForce 830A vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830A and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 594 MHz
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 256 vs 40
- 12.4x better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 47.52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 792 MHz
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1188 vs 123
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3302 vs 782
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3302 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 25 February 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 594 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops vs 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 792 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1188 vs 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3302 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3302 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 407 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830A
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 830A | ATI Radeon HD 4250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1188 | 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1767 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1767 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3302 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3302 | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 830A | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM108 | RV620 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 25 February 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 798 | 800 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 594 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 181 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.34 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 792 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |