AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830A

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce 830A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce 830A

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
1881.5x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2415 vs 1202
Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 355
3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14191 vs 4315
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2524 vs 1767
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 2889
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3302
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2524 vs 1767
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 2889
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3302

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 22 July 2014
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2415 vs 1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	415 vs 355
Geekbench - OpenCL	14191 vs 4315
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524 vs 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274 vs 2889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3302
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524 vs 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274 vs 2889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3302

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830A

Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt

Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830A

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2415

1202

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

415

355

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14191

4315

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

1767

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

2889

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3302

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

1767

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

2889

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3302

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA GeForce 830A
PassMark - G3D Mark	2415	1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	415	355
Geekbench - OpenCL	14191	4315
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	2889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3302
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	2889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3302

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA GeForce 830A
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	Maxwell
Code name	Lexa	GM108
Launch date	27 May 2019	22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	853	856
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz	1150 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1082 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s	18.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million
Floating-point performance		588.8 gflops
Pipelines		256
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	6.6" (168 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)