NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 24.5x more texture fill rate: 24.48 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 161.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1295 vs 8
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 154
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 6 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1295 vs 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 154 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1295 | 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Rankine |
Code name | GM108 | NV34 A2 |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 6 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1115 | 1083 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | |
Transistor count | 45 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |