NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 64 vs 16
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 44.8 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 44.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 87 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G94 |
Launch date | 27 August 2008 | 21 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1340 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44.8 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 240 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCI | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD |