NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- 2x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 84.8 gflops vs 44.8 gflops
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 84.8 gflops vs 44.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G96 |
Launch date | 27 August 2008 | 19 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1579 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44.8 gflops | 84.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCI | MXM-II |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |