NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G and NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 61 vs 37
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 October 2008 vs 14 August 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 61 vs 37 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 221 vs 68
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1640 vs 1044
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1640 vs 1044
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 vs 68 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 vs 1044 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 68 | 221 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 61 | 37 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1044 | 1640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1044 | 1640 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | C79MX | G96 |
Launch date | 15 October 2008 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1601 | 1602 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | |
Price now | $527 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 314 million |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2 / GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |