NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs AMD Radeon HD 6370M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940M and AMD Radeon HD 6370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 903.2 gflops vs 120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1126 vs 276
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5925 vs 2744
- 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 vs 0.171
- 7.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 281
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 1297
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1885
- 7.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 281
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 1297
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1885
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 26 November 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1072 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 vs 276 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5925 vs 2744 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 vs 0.171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 vs 281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 vs 1297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 vs 281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 vs 1297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1885 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370M
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 154
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 vs 154 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6370M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | AMD Radeon HD 6370M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 | 276 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 401 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5925 | 2744 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 0.171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 1297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 1297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1885 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940M | AMD Radeon HD 6370M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Robson |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 26 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1227 | 1229 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |