NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs AMD Radeon R7 M260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and AMD Radeon R7 M260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 940 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 721.9 gflops
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 vs 517
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 172 vs 125
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 vs 5125
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 vs 14.249
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.94 vs 145.3
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 vs 0.925
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 vs 19.992
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 77.895
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 1404
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 1093
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1704
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 1404
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 1093
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 vs 11 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 721.9 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 vs 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 vs 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 vs 5125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 vs 14.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 vs 145.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 vs 0.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 vs 19.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 vs 77.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 5125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 14.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 145.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 0.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 19.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 77.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1704 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Topaz |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1071 | 1479 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $799 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 940 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 721.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 22.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 32 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |