NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs AMD Radeon R7 M260
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce 940MX und AMD Radeon R7 M260 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:954 MHz vs 940 MHz
- Etwa 1% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 993 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Texturfüllrate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
- Etwa 6% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 762.6 gflops vs 721.9 gflops
- 5x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 vs 517
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 172 vs 125
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 vs 5125
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 vs 14.249
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.94 vs 145.3
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 vs 0.925
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 vs 19.992
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 77.895
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 1404
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 1093
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1704
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 1404
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 1093
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1704
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 28 June 2016 vs 11 June 2014 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 993 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 23.83 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 762.6 gflops vs 721.9 gflops |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 vs 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 vs 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 vs 5125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 vs 14.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 vs 145.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 vs 0.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 vs 19.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 vs 77.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1704 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 5125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 14.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 145.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 0.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 19.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 77.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1704 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
Codename | GM108 | Topaz |
Startdatum | 28 June 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1071 | 1479 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $799 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $799 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 993 MHz | 980 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz | 940 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 762.6 gflops | 721.9 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 22.56 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Berechnungseinheiten | 6 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | medium sized |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 40.1 GB / s | 32 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |