NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 vs 4493
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 vs 12.582
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 vs 1.254
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 vs 18.386
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 23.499
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3332
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3332
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 vs 545
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 vs 27 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 vs 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 vs 545 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1516
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 172
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 312.94
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2486
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2486
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 172 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 312.94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 2486 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK106 |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 | 27 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1071 | 1003 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |