NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 835 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 950 MHz
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 729.6 gflops
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 vs 1445
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 vs 4062
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 vs 10.837
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 vs 1.098
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 vs 21.798
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 33.754
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 1094
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3176
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 1094
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3176
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 vs 475

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 172
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 405.086 vs 312.94

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1516 1445
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	172 269
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6325 4062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.91 10.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.94 405.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.83 1.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.833 21.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	103.937 33.754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3176
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3176
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	585 475

Compare specifications (specs)