NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 914 MHz
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 993 MHz
• Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 89% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 1516
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 172
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 vs 6325
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 28.91
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 vs 312.94
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 vs 1.83
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 vs 27.833
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 103.937
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 2486
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3587
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 2486
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3587
• 5.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 585

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1516 2577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	172 217
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6325 9744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.91 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.94 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.83 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.833 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	103.937 139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	585 3350

Compare specifications (specs)