NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 914 MHz
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1000 or 2500 MHz
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 914 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1000 or 2500 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 89% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 44.96 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 89% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 versus 1516
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 versus 172
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 versus 6325
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 versus 28.91
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 versus 312.94
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 versus 1.83
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 versus 27.833
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 versus 103.937
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 versus 2486
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3587
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 versus 2486
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3587
- 5.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 versus 585
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 993 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2577 versus 1516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 versus 172 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9744 versus 6325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 versus 28.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 versus 312.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 versus 1.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 versus 27.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 versus 103.937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 versus 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 versus 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 versus 585 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 2577 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 217 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 9744 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 42.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 373.644 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 2.54 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 39.412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 139.158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 4148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 4148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 3350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 797 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 914 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 32 or 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2500M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 A330
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
