NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2109 vs 435
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 2332
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 2332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 October 2015 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 vs 435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 2332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 2332 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 263 vs 240
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 263 vs 240 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 263 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 2332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 2332 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | GM107 | Scrapper |
| Launch date | 27 October 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 951 | 954 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
