NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 vs 6869
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 vs 22.112
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 380.461 vs 297.631
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 vs 1.427
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.027 vs 15.363
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 vs 99.125
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2490
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2490
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 October 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 vs 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 vs 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 vs 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 vs 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 vs 2109
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 240
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 vs 2109 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 vs 240 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2961 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2961 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 2231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 474 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 27 October 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 972 | 974 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 160 mm | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |