NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 580 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 134 vs 99
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1053 vs 800
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1053 vs 800
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2008 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 134 vs 99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1053 vs 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1053 vs 800 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 72 vs 59
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 72 vs 59 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 134 | 99 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 72 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1053 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1053 | 800 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G84 | MCP7A |
Launch date | 1 February 2008 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1603 | 1605 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 580 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 60.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 289 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCI |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2 / GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 |