NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 7.6 GTexel / s
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 60.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 221 vs 134
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1640 vs 1053
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1640 vs 1053
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 1 February 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 7.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops vs 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 vs 134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 vs 1053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 vs 1053 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 37
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 37 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 | 134 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 37 | 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 | 1053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 | 1053 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96 | G84 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 1 February 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | |
Place in performance rating | 1603 | 1604 |
Price now | $527 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 289 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 / GDDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |