NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 7.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 74% better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 60.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 212 vs 134
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1727 vs 1053
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1727 vs 1053
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 1 February 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 7.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops vs 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 vs 134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1727 vs 1053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1727 vs 1053 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 39
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 39 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 | 134 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 39 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5644 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1727 | 1053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1727 | 1053 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT216 | G84 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 1 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1601 | 1604 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 950 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 60.8 gflops |
Gigaflops | 158 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | HDA | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3) | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |