NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs ATI Radeon 7200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO and ATI Radeon 7200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 9.6x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 143 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 384 MB vs 32 MB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 143 MHz
- 109.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 328 vs 3
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 97 vs 94
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2008 vs 1 June 2000 |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 384 MB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 328 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 vs 94 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 7200
- 37.7x more texture fill rate: 996 MTexel / s vs 26.4 billion / sec
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 105 Watt
Texture fill rate | 996 MTexel / s vs 26.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 7200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | ATI Radeon 7200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 328 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 | 94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | ATI Radeon 7200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 6 |
Code name | G92 | R100 |
Launch date | 28 April 2008 | 1 June 2000 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1408 | 1409 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz | 143 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 264 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 billion / sec | 996 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 30 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV | 1x VGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 5.31 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 143 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |