ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 264 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 384 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 vs 323
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 90
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 vs 28 April 2008 |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 264 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 384 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 vs 323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 vs 90 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 billion / sec vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2160 vs 2113
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2160 vs 2113
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 26.4 billion / sec vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2160 vs 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2160 vs 2113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 | 323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 | 90 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 | 2160 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Redwood | G92 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 | 28 April 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $49.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1427 | 1430 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops | 264 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s | 26.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 627 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 384 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5670 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6570
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
