NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 105 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 384 MB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 398 vs 328
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2917 vs 2160
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2917 vs 2160

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 550 MHz
• Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 96 vs 64
• Around 50% better floating-point performance: 264 gflops vs 176 gflops
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 97 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	398 328
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 97
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2917 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2917 2160

Compare specifications (specs)