NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 18.9x more texture fill rate: 26.4 billion / sec vs 1.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 384 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 19x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 323 vs 17
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2008 vs 17 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 billion / sec vs 1.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 384 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 323 vs 17 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 122 vs 90
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 122 vs 90 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 323 | 17 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 90 | 122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rankine |
Code name | G92 | NV31 A1 |
Launch date | 28 April 2008 | 17 March 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1430 | 1293 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz | 350 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 264 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 billion / sec | 1.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 80 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | 191 mm |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |