NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 10.8 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 64 vs 32
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 92.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 170
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 44 vs 26
- 316.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 10
- 316.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 10
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2008 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 10.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 64 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops vs 92.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 vs 26 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 10 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 96 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 13.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1728 vs 127
- 13.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1728 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 96 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1728 vs 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1728 vs 127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 | 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 | 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 127 | 1728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 127 | 1728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G84 |
Launch date | 21 February 2008 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1587 | 1539 |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz | 675 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops | 92.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 64 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 96 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | 198 mm |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |